Joined
·
1,662 Posts
Let me start by saying that I have been kinda blasted for bringing this up in different threads of these 2nd init roms and am not looking for that here. I'm trying to understand this a little better and find out if there is anyone looking into it. This is a feature of the Froyo based 2nd init roms I miss. (and others do as well)
Is there a way to get the 2nd init roms to report in 1%? I know that on the 602 blur based roms (Shuji,SSM,Vortex) they report in 10% BUT battery widgets such as battery monitor and moto charge will give you 1%. Now switch to roms such as CM7 and MIUI on the GB kernel, and you get 10% and that's it. If you use things like those battery widgets I mentioned, you get readouts like 148293406%. I'm trying to figure out why that is. In the froyo versions it was as easy as adding a line to the build.prop file. But the GB kernel is not being very nice or cooperative about it. Is it something in the way the bootloader is hijacked on this kernel? Is it something in the build.prop file that is preventing it? Or is it something just can't be figured out and fixed?
I guess I'm asking for myself. Maybe to see what I can do to help figure it out. Maybe to see if it's even possible. Or maybe just to learn a little more about the way things work. Whatever way it is, if all you're gonna do is blast me as well, then please don't bother to reply. I do not want to start a words war about something like this. I'm just looking for info and that's it.
Thanks all!
Is there a way to get the 2nd init roms to report in 1%? I know that on the 602 blur based roms (Shuji,SSM,Vortex) they report in 10% BUT battery widgets such as battery monitor and moto charge will give you 1%. Now switch to roms such as CM7 and MIUI on the GB kernel, and you get 10% and that's it. If you use things like those battery widgets I mentioned, you get readouts like 148293406%. I'm trying to figure out why that is. In the froyo versions it was as easy as adding a line to the build.prop file. But the GB kernel is not being very nice or cooperative about it. Is it something in the way the bootloader is hijacked on this kernel? Is it something in the build.prop file that is preventing it? Or is it something just can't be figured out and fixed?
I guess I'm asking for myself. Maybe to see what I can do to help figure it out. Maybe to see if it's even possible. Or maybe just to learn a little more about the way things work. Whatever way it is, if all you're gonna do is blast me as well, then please don't bother to reply. I do not want to start a words war about something like this. I'm just looking for info and that's it.
Thanks all!