Android OS Forum banner
1 - 20 of 22 Posts

·
Android Beginner
Joined
·
43 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
In all of the threads i've looked at so far, I haven't seen a solid performance comparison yet. Has anyone run any of the popular benchmarking apps on it? (I realize that those scores aren't always the best) Maybe at the very least, the opinions of someone who has used Liberty/Apex/Etc. with a decent comparison?

As always, i'm amazed at the technical wizardry that cvpcs has been working with 2nd init.

Thanks!
 

·
Android Beginner
Joined
·
43 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
yeah i kinda guessed that may happen. I've heard of similar things happening on other apps when the youtube app was crashing (typically relating to rendering/audio issues).
 
G

·
Quadrant failed, reporting an Error during CPU test. And on LinPack, MFLOPS: 11.691 Time 7.17 Seconds. Norm Res 5.68 Precision: 2.220446049250313E-16 lol Not really understanding linpack but its w/e. Benchmark testing has never been greatly accurate or a good basis to use for a rom..
 

·
Average Android
Joined
·
65 Posts
Benchmarking tools are useless for determining differences between two different roms. Devs say this over and over again, still nobody listens.

If you're coming from stock .596, you'll find "lightning fast" to be a severe understatement regarding the speed of this rom.
 

·
Boot Themer
Joined
·
483 Posts
qqeyes said:
Benchmarking tools are useless for determining differences between two different roms. Devs say this over and over again, still nobody listens.

If you're coming from stock .596, you'll find "lightning fast" to be a severe understatement regarding the speed of this rom.
+1

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
 

·
Bomb Squad
Joined
·
58 Posts
Performance is awesome for me, just as snappy or even snappier than GB. Battery life, on the other hand... is miserable. I can deal with that for now though.
 

·
Android Apprentice
Joined
·
11 Posts
ok got a qstn an a few prblm...when i sbf bacck to stock and flsahed cm should i put 596 over it?
 

·
Average Android
Joined
·
172 Posts
The performance is great from a purely subjective standpoint. I have never had a ROM that is so smooth. As others have said, the poor battery life, broken camera and broken GPS are a bit tragic, but it is a beta.
 

·
I just hide here
Joined
·
2,237 Posts
dr_who_droidx said:
ok got a qstn an a few prblm...when i sbf bacck to stock and flsahed cm should i put 596 over it?
Droid-Xer said:
Don't install 596. All you need are the cm7 zip and gapps
ya they actually updated it so u dont even need to flash .596 anymore...u just install cm7. it installs .340 for u and then installs cm7...then u install gapps and the radio
 

·
Average Android
Joined
·
172 Posts
SyNiK4L said:
ya they actually updated it so u dont even need to flash .596 anymore...u just install cm7. it installs .596 for u and then installs cm7...then u install gapps and the radio
You actually get bumped down to .340 before it installs CM7. The 2nd init is using the Froyo .340 kernels to launch CM7.
 

·
I just hide here
Joined
·
2,237 Posts
teh_g said:
You actually get bumped down to .340 before it installs CM7. The 2nd init is using the Froyo .340 kernels to launch CM7.
errr...ya thats my bad thats what i meant to say. editing
 

·
Android Beginner
Joined
·
22 Posts
It is unbelievable how fast this rom is, battery life is pretty bad tho... im running 3 homescreens and its stil worse than .596 with all 7 screens filled with widgets and blur running... hopefully that gets ironed out because it should be much better as I have FAR FAR less background processes running... even with the screen off it drops pretty quick
 
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Top